The Texas Freedom Network Insider gives us a look this morning at an intriguing and influential line of conservative educational thinking. For several decades now, conservative educational activists have claimed to be fighting for their civil rights.
Patrick, as chair of the Senate Education Committee, made his statement in favor of Senate Bill 573. The bill would allow homeschool and private-school students to compete in the state’s University Interscholastic League.
Patrick claimed in a recent hearing,
“When you say the UIL has functioned for a hundred years, and everybody’s been happy, if you were black in this state before the civil rights movement, it didn’t function for you. And now I feel there’s discrimination against Catholics and Christians in these parochial schools.”
The TFN columnist and several commentators did not buy Patrick’s argument. After sharing pictures of a lavish private school and a cramped, inadequate African-American school (c. 1941), the TFN columnist asked, “Seriously, guys?”
Commenter Linda Hunter asked, “Is it possible he [Patrick] actually believes what he’s saying? If so, perhaps he received the standard whitewashed version of history in school. Oh, I don’t think even that explains his argument.”
Whether Patrick is sincere or not, this line of argument has long been a favorite of conservative educational thinkers and activists.
To cite just one example, in the early 1980s the late creationist leader Duane Gish was invited to join a conference of mainstream scientists to discuss evolution and creationism. At the time, Gish was a leading voice at the Institute for Creation Research and best known for his book Evolution: The Fossils Say No! (1973, 1978, 1979)
At the conference with the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Gish grumbled right away that he had been led into a trap. He complained that only two creationists had been invited to face a bevy of evolutionists. As he put it, he would “proceed to take one of the two seats on the back of the bus reserved for the creationists in this meeting.”
Around the same time, the creationist academic Jerry Bergman protested that he had been denied tenure at Bowling Green State University due to rampant discrimination against his religious beliefs. As Bergman claimed in his 1984 book The Criterion,
“Several universities state it was their ‘right’ to protect students from creationists and, in one case, from ‘fundamentalist Christians.’. . . This is all plainly illegal, but it is extremely difficult to bring redress against these common, gross injustices. This is due to the verbal ‘smoke-screen’ thrown up around the issue. But, a similar case might be if a black were fired on the suspicion that he had ‘talked to students about being black,’ or a woman being fired for having ‘talked to students about women’s issues.’
For Gish and Bergman in the 1980s, as for Senator Patrick today, as for the generation of conservative activists in between, the notion is a powerful one. Many intellectuals and pundits have claimed that conservatives today face the same kind of repression that bedeviled African Americans in the run-up to the Civil Rights movement in the 1950s.
For those of us who want to understand conservative educational philosophy, the Texas Freedom Network’s question is not the point. Whether or not conservatives really believe they are oppressed, pundits and politicians have found the claim of minority persecution effective.
Check out Senator Patrick’s speech on the TFN Insider. They include a video so we can see this ideology in action.
 Duane T. Gish, “The Scientific Case for Creation,” in Frank Awbrey and William Thwaites, eds., Evolutionists Confront Creationists: Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Vol. I, Part 3 (San Francisco: Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1984), 26.
 Jerry Bergman, The Criterion: Religious Discrimination in America (Richfield, MN: Onesimus Press, 1984), 44.