According to a story from Religion News Service, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins accused the Southern Poverty Law Center of inciting a hate crime against them on Wednesday. The irony is beyond painful. The SPLC has long been a leading voice identifying and condemning right-wing hate violence. Is Perkins’ accusation a mere stunt? Or does the SPLC have to acknowledge its role in this crime?
On Wednesday, Floyd Lee Corkins II allegedly entered an FRC office in Washington DC and shot unarmed security guard Leo Johnson in the arm.
FRC President Perkins blamed the SPLC for inciting this violent act. Perkins claimed,
“Corkins was given a license to shoot an unarmed man by organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center that have been reckless in labeling organizations as hate groups because they disagree with them on public policy.”
The SPLC has, in fact, accused the FRC of some despicable actions. According to the SPLC, the FRC demonizes homosexuality. FRC leaders, according to the SPLC, have publicly advocated the expulsion of all homosexuals from the USA. The FRC, according to the SPLC, has also equated homosexuality with pedophilia. These are not insignificant claims.
As Chris Lisee reported for Religion News Service, the alleged shooter had been an activist at some local gay-rights organizations. Even more curious, he had been carrying a large bag of Chick-fil-A sandwiches. The symbolism seems unmistakeable. After all, given the recent culture-war dust-up over Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy, a gay activist might not usually purchase fifteen sandwiches from the chain. Fox News claims that just before opening fire, Corkins said, “I don’t like your politics.”
So was this an anti-fundamentalist hate-crime? Can the SPLC be held accountable? The SPLC’s Mark Potok called the FRC claim “outrageous.” Other gay-rights organizations quickly condemned the shooting. Potok’s defense makes an important point. The FRC shooting was a tragedy, Potok claimed, but Perkins was cynically taking advantage of this event to claim a “false equivalency” between the FRC and other victims of hate crimes.
Nevertheless, Perkins’ accusation raises important questions. As we’ve seen with other recent culture-war violence, such as the deadly shootings at the Sikh temple near Milwaukee, the dangers of escalating America’s culture war are real. Language that demonizes the opposition hurts us all. The solution must be more along the lines of Matthew Lee Anderson’s and John Corvino’s response to the Chick-fil-A affair: we must talk to one another. Openly, honestly, and even painfully and awkwardly, if necessary. We don’t need to agree, and we must avoid the false solution of merely papering over our disagreements. But we must also all agree–as most groups do in this case–that violence is not part of these discussions.