Creationists: Sass Your Teachers?!?!

Apparently, that is the new strategy promoted by Indiana State Senator Dennis Kruse.

Sometimes, studying cultural battles over America’s schools seems like Yogi Berra’s déjà vu all over again.  But this one sounds new to me.

Thanks to the Sensuous Curmudgeon, we learn of Kruse’s new strategy.  Apparently, having failed to promote a two-models creation/evolution bill in the last legislative session, Kruse plans to offer a bill that will encourage students in Indiana’s schools to ask teachers to back up ideas with facts.

According to the Indianapolis Star, Kruse defended his plan as a “truth-in-education” measure:  “. . . if a student thinks something isn’t true, then they can question the teacher and the teacher would have to come up with some kind of research to support that what they are teaching is true or not true.”

Kruse’s new strategy comes on the heels of new rules in New Hampshire and Missouri that will allow every public school student to recuse himself or herself from curricular materials he or she finds objectionable.  As I’ve argued elsewhere, these laws just won’t work.  Ideology and theology and biology aside, the classroom implementation of such regulations seems utterly impossible.

As the Indianapolis Star reports, critics have pointed out similar flaws with Kruse’s plan.  Nate Schnellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, argued that teachers could be asked to supply proof of everything, from evolution to the moon landing.  “It’s not workable,” Schnellenberger concluded.

The intention of such bills is clear: conservatives hope to protect students from indoctrination in ideas they find loathsome.  In Kruse’s case, he takes a weatherbeaten play from the old progressive playbook to make it happen.  If students can direct their own educations—challenging the classroom authority of their teachers on every point—then the chances of swallowing objectionable ideas decreases dramatically.

As in Missouri and New Hampshire, conservatives find themselves fighting for the old progressive dream: an individualized education for every child in public schools.  Will it work in Indiana?



Leave a comment


  1. Gordon

     /  December 4, 2012

    Is this technique also to be used in church?

  2. misterscribner

     /  December 8, 2012

    As liberal commentators continue to pile on to Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal for recent remarks and actions:


    • Cam, Yep, saw this one this morning. It is a good example of the kind of muddle these issues produce. First, I should out myself as someone who typically votes Democratic. This past election I went a full straight ticket. So I don’t object to Blow’s argument on partisan grounds. But on historical grounds and intellectual grounds I think it is garbage. First of all, Blow invokes the tired and inaccurate “anti-intellectualism” to describe contemporary GOP cultural politics. In my opinion, using that label may be good politics, but it is a horrible way to understand folks such as Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal, and Verne Kaub for that matter. As a teacher I shudder at the mess my students get into if they shrug off conservatism as simple “anti-intellectualism.” Second, if the GOP is truly the party of anti-intellectualism, it should be scoring much bigger electoral victories, IMHO. Both major parties appeal to strong anti-intellectual electoral motifs. The GOP mainly suffers, I think, not from the curse of anti-intellectualism, but from a reputation as the party of rich white people.

  1. Creationists Embrace “Truth in Education” in Indiana
  2. Kruse-ing to Conservative Schools | I Love You but You're Going to Hell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s