Sexting: Sex Ed’s Cutting Edge?

How would you feel if your teenage children received sexually explicit sexual text messages?  How would you feel if they received them from the City of New York?

Ruthie Dean recounts her experiences with the new program for Christianity Today.  As part of its aggressive public campaign against teen pregnancy, the City of New York operates a texting service.

Most coverage of this program has focused on the posters.  These posters have emphasized the financial cost of teen pregnancy.  But every poster also includes a number to text in order to find out more.

Image Source: New York City Human Resources Administration

Image Source: New York City Human Resources Administration

Dean tried it.

Dean describes receiving a series of explicit text messages, describing the fictional story of two teenagers who got pregnant accidentally.  The texts ask teens to answer questions about sex and pregnancy, including questions such as “What should you say to a guy if he says: ‘I don’t like wearing a condom’? Text your reply.”

Dean argues that the text approach makes some sense.  If teens will only read texts, then why not send out important sex information that way?  Other critics of the program have focused on the questionable tactic of public shaming as a way to decrease teen pregnancy.  Dean laments the text program itself.  Not only does it seem glitchy—some of Dean’s questions went unanswered—but the notion that the important and sensitive topic of sex can be handled in brief informational bursts seems inhuman and inhumane.

What do conservatives think of this approach to sex ed?  Most conservative commentary has focused on the poster campaign.

Writing in the conservative City Journal, Heather MacDonald called the campaign “gutsy.”  Like the commentators on Fox News, MacDonald applauded Mayor Bloomberg for his willingness to take on the liberal establishment.  Though Planned Parenthood attacked the ads for “stigmatizing” teen pregnancy, MacDonald wrote, the posters only publicized “incontrovertible facts that social science has known for decades but that professors and politicians have not dared inject into the public sphere.”

But what about the texting program?  Conservative pundits might praise the posters for their willingness to offend liberal sentiment.  But do conservatives really approve of sexually explicit text messages sent directly to teen phones?  That does not seem to match the history of conservative opposition to sex ed in America’s public schools.

Advertisements
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s