The Dangers of Dunking on D’Souza

Whose history is the “real” one? For the past few months, Princeton’s Kevin Kruse has been conducting a master class in responding to partisan punditry in the field of US History. As I argue this morning at History News Network, though, Prof. Kruse’s efforts are not likely to convince many conservatives.kruse dunk twitter

I won’t re-hash the argument, but if you’re interested, click on over and check it out. And if you’re really curious, you can also follow the discussion about Twitter on Twitter.

Advertisements
Leave a comment

2 Comments

  1. I have not been following this topic but @axelbeingcivil over on History News Network asks, “Out of curiosity, what are the statistics on this?”

    When I read the article, my suspicions were raised, or perhaps it was a case of smelling putrid fish. The statistics are a mathematical curiosity known as Simpson’s Paradox. The particular example that is being referred to is:

    http://www.math.usu.edu/adele/s1040/simpsons_paradox.pdf

    As I have said, I have not been following this, but the question that I would ask is:

    Did Dinesh D’Souza arrive at his conclusion after performing a statistical analysis of the actual voting patterns, or did he find find this counter-intuitive result somewhere (like the above) and decide that he could use it to make a convincing argument to mislead the innocent?

    Reply
  1. If Dunking is Dangerous…Then What? | I Love You but You're Going to Hell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s