Pro-Evolution Ia: What Evolution Does NOT Mean


What is evolution?  People use the term in a lot of different ways.  One of the things that will help explain why so many people believe in evolution will be clarify what people mean when they say it.  Here are a couple of things it DOESN’T mean:

  • Humans evolved from apes.  This idea has been curiously offensive and distracting to the real argument.  In the
    modern evolutionary synthesis, the consensus is that all living things on earth had a common ancestor.  Over millions of years, different forms of life developed from that common ancestor.  Humans and other primates all diverged from
    one another relatively late in this process. But humans didn’t evolve out of monkeys or apes.  Rather, humans and other hominids split off from the same “branch” of the “tree (or bush) of life” that monkeys and apes split off from.
  • “Darwinism.” A lot of confusion can come from using Darwinism as a synonym for evolution.  Those who are trying to
    obscure the truth about evolution—some of them merely to profit from the huge market for anti-evolution materials—often confuse the issue by telling audiences that “Darwinism” has been rejected by scientists.  That’s true enough, sort of.  Darwin’s original ideas about evolution have been tested and challenged vigorously since the publication of Origin of Species in 1859.  Some of them have been discarded.  Thus, it is easy to find examples of prominent scientists in various decades saying that “Darwinism” is dead.  What they mean is that Charles Darwin’s ideas about the mechanism of evolution have been challenged by scientists.  They do NOT mean that the fact of organic evolution has been rejected.
  • God is a lie.
    The fact of evolution doesn’t have a bearing on theology.  It does not disprove the Bible.  Some of the most famous theologians in history, such as St. Augustine, embraced an evolutionary worldview.  And many prominent evolutionists, including Dobzhansky, believe in God.  They simply believe that evolution is God’s method.  Nor
    does the theory of evolution shackle God in some way.  Just because there is a mechanism by which species can change and develop does not mean that God has been robbed of power.  A tree grows from a seed.  That does not imply that God has been locked out of the process.  It does not have any bearing on the possibility of miracles or God’s supernatural involvement.  It would be fair enough to say, in fact, that a tree developing from a seed is a miracle that requires God’s guiding hand.

Theodosius Dobzhansky, “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution,”  The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 35, No. 3 (Mar., 1973), pp. 125-129; Edward J. Larson, Evolution: The Remarkable History of a Scientific Theory (New York: The Modern Library, 2006).

Leave a comment


  1. Evolution is more impossible than the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and the Headless Horseman. See for a list of bluffing evolutionists.

    • Jameson

       /  September 3, 2011

      Are you Karl Priest? You claim to have used mathematics to disprove evolution. If you had you would have achieved a great deal of worldwide fame. You would have showed that proof to the Catholic church naturally, as they accept evolution as fact. Anyone who had proven such wouldn’t keep it to themselves or the children they are miseducating, they would announce it to the world and it would succeed or fail on its merits.

      Why hasn’t your disproof of evolution convinced even the Catholic church, which has every reason to want to see evolution disproven?

      The answer of course is obvious. You have no such proof. You are just another lying creationist.

  2. Josh Stewart

     /  September 4, 2011

    Lol. Troll.

  3. Bender

     /  September 4, 2011

    God is a lie.
    The fact of evolution doesn’t have a bearing on theology. It does not disprove the Bible.

    Evolution does have a bearing on theology, and certainly disproves the Genesis, in case you need disproving a tale about talking snakes. Evolution makes god unnecessary. And even if you believe evolution “is god’s method”, that still means you have to abandon the idea of a loving, caring god, because natural selection is extremely cruel. Would a loving god come up with an idea that means that every single creature on the planet has to fight for its life every single day? And that 99.99% of all life-forms that ever existed went extinct leaving no trace of their existence? Woud a loving god create a parasite that feeds on the eyes of humans, or any other creature for that matter?

    Evolution works exactly as you’d expect if there was no god. It’s silly to say that “evolution is just god’s method”? Method for what? Creating humans? Really, that’s the most efficient method he could find? Nor Dobzhansky or any other of those “prominent religious evolutionists” has explained yet why their god let the dinosaurs thrive for 200 million years before giving mammals a chance.

  1. The Experts Have Spoken. So Have the Beauty Queens. Now It’s My Turn. « History and America's Schools

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: