A pro-life student group at Yale University has been refused membership in a “social justice” organization. Why? Because, in the words of one student leader, “The pro-life, anti-choice agenda stands in the way of gender equity, and thus in the way of social justice.”
The controversy raises difficult questions: Is conservative religion still seen as a legitimate force for good? For “social justice?” Or has conservatism become irredeemably trapped by accusations of bigotry? At least in the effete environs of Yale, it seems pro-life thinking has been stripped of its moral legitimacy.
The student group, Choose Life at Yale (CLAY), had been a provisional member of Dwight Hall, an umbrella group of student social-justice clubs. Membership in Dwight Hall would have given CLAY access to meeting rooms and a sense of campus legitimacy.
Is pro-life a “social justice” cause? Former CLAY president Michael Gerken thinks it is. As he explained in the pages of First Things, CLAY members
realized that abortion has never been solely a matter of a baby’s life and liberty. It’s about the desperation and hopelessness of the mother that walked into the clinic. It’s about the grandfather who will never put that little girl in his lap. It’s about the classmates who will never sit next to her, and the boy who will never work up the courage to write her that awkward poem. It’s even about that friend who she would drift away from over the years, the successful sister who would make her insecure, and the God she’d curse when she lost her job and then her mortgage. The biggest lie in all this is that the choice to end (or to save) a life is a solitary one.
Of course, Yale will always have a special place in the history of conservatism and education. It was William F. Buckley’s precocious expose of the godless atmosphere on campus that launched his career, and in many ways signaled the start of the modern conservative movement.
And college campuses have become leading forums to debate whether or not conservative religious ideas are legitimate traditions or vestiges of bigotry. ILYBYGTH readers may remember a case at Tufts University a while back. In that case, the evangelical student group Intervarsity was stripped of its official student-group status. Other student groups complained that the prominent evangelical group represented an inherently bigoted worldview, one that did not recognize the full equality of homosexual students.
The current controversy at Yale represents a similar conundrum. Do conservative religious groups automatically lose the right to participate in campus life? Is it inherently bigoted to fight against abortion or gay marriage? Perhaps most important, who gets to define “social justice?”