MOOCing Jesus

Does online education work? A new survey of college faculty by Gallup for Inside Higher Education offers an unstartling new answer: It depends. Here at ILYBYGTH, we have a different question: Does online education work for conservative religious colleges?

After all, as I’m exploring in my new book, conservative religious colleges have always had a different goal from secular schools. Instead of just hoping to prepare students for careers and intelligent life, conservative schools have also intended to bolster the faith of their students. They have worried that any change might lead them into a slow slide into secularism. As a corollary, most conservative schools have maintained stricter lifestyle rules over students than secular colleges have. Conservative schools have insisted that classes be led faithfully, not just competently. But can they do this in online classes?

The survey of faculty for Inside Higher Ed includes some interesting points. [You can click to get the entire report, but you have to register.] In brief, faculty remain unconvinced that online education can deliver equal results to old-fashioned in-person classes. Online classes might do a good job—in some cases—at delivering content. But most faculty agree: there is something important lost when face-to-face interaction isn’t a leading part of university classes.


Source: Carl Straumsheim, “Online Ed Skepticism and Self-Sufficiency: Survey of Faculty Views on Technology,” Inside Higher Education, October 29, 2014.

The survey specifically excluded some of the schools we’re interested in, what it calls “Bible colleges and seminaries.” And none of the questions included anything about student faith.

But no one interested in online higher education these days can ignore the fundamentalist elephant in the room. Liberty University, a school founded by Jerry Falwell in 1971, now claims almost 100,000 online students. In addition to standard online coursework, Liberty offers online spiritual help, too. Students can join online prayer groups and Bible blogs.

But this menu of religious fare does not seem to match the traditional goals of conservative religious colleges. At most schools, the faith of students has been the primary concern, not merely an additional click on a webpage. And most college administrators have been keenly worried about sliding into heterodoxy and secularism. In his brilliant 1994 dissertation about Wheaton College, historian Michael Hamilton explained this sentiment like this:

The paradigm that has dominated Wheaton through the [twentieth] century holds that colleges, more than any other type of institution, are highly susceptible to change, and that change can only move in one direction—from orthodoxy toward apostasy. . . . The very process of change, no matter how slow and benign it may seem at first, will always move the college in a secular direction, inevitably gathering momentum and becoming unstoppable, ending only when secularization is complete.

This mindset, I believe, is common among conservative evangelical schools. From Wheaton, to Biola, to Gordon, to more conservative schools such as Bob Jones and Liberty…all have worried that change will equal declension. All have been concerned, first and foremost, that novelty will lead faculty and students to abandon their faiths.

So here’s the question we wished Inside Higher Ed had asked professors at conservative schools: How can online education remain orthodox? How can the faith of students be preserved if student/teacher interaction is weakened?

And perhaps this is the toughest question for the folks at Liberty University: Has their wildly successful pursuit of online education changed their goal? Has Liberty abandoned its religious mission? Or, rather, could this massive online presence be compared to the televangelism of an earlier generation? Could the thousands of online students be seen as an enormous “mission field” for Liberty’s evangelical message?

Leave a comment


  1. I would suggest that you pose this question to Samantha Field—who could probably write you a very opinionated dissertation on this subject. She is a fairly recent alumna of Liberty University.

    • I believe Samantha Field attended Pensacola Christian College.

      • Yes. Indeed she did—but she told me that she did her graduate studies in English literature at Liberty University. Believe me Adam. She has her fingers on the pulse of Liberty University from actually being there. Give her a ring (old telephone cliche).

  2. Seems to me in conversations like these, there are really two issues feeding into the discussion: the size of the MOOC and the format. I’ve taught online classes and blended online/offline classes (e.g. one class meeting and significant online interaction (not necessarily everyone at the same time) rather than two meetings each week), and I found there wasn’t really any student outcome I couldn’t work towards just as efficiently over email and Skype than I could in office hours, and there was even less difference when it came to the group components. But then I was working with a similar size group of students so there wasn’t really any trade-off in efficiency from the uni’s perspective.

    For my money: I’m sure a clever teacher could teach a course on the Pauline Epistles, say, and do it through an online course rather than traditional in-class meetings without sacrificing either learning or spiritual development – but not if he’s teaching 300 rather than 30. And you’re obviously not going to get anything outside the course just by taking a MOOC, which is where I suspect real spiritual development is most likely to take place. But if places like Liberty take nontraditional or evening students or anyone who takes courses at the school but aren’t really involved in the extracurriculars, I’m not sure that an online course would be any more a break from what they’re used to doing than that.

    I do wish the survey had been a bit clearer about what it means by online ed. Most people these days hear online and atomatically think MOOC, and that tends to confuse the results.

  1. If You Don’t Think It Matters, then YOU’RE the Idiot | I Love You but You're Going to Hell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: