Where Can a Conservative Safely Go to College?

What is a parent to do? There are a million college guides out there. How can we tell what school is right for our kid(s)? Most parents and students are concerned with things such as party culture, cost, programs, and prestige. For some students, though, a school’s friendliness to conservatism might be a primary consideration. For those folks, the conservative Intercollegiate Studies Institute has published its latest guide to colleges and universities.

ISI college guide

The RIGHT schools…

We all know that college rankings are a scam. Publishers prey on families’ anxieties to offer a dog’s breakfast of ranking systems. Depending on how schools are evaluated, we can come up with wildly varying scales.

I can say this in full confidence, since my beloved Binghamton University usually comes out near the top. In the recent Kiplinger’s ranking, for instance, we came out 22nd among public universities, 16th for out-of-state students. That puts us far above bigger schools such as Colorado (90), Iowa (55), and Michigan State (40), Alabama (46), Texas A&M (35), and Illinois (26). More important, I’m pretty sure our never-defeated football team could utterly crush the squads from any of those other schools.

But what does that ranking mean? In the Kiplinger’s system, factors such as cost, average completion rate, average student debt load, and other financial factors dominate. Is that really what people care most about when it comes to picking an institution of higher education?

For students and families with more specific questions, everybody and their brother have published niche guides to colleges. For the young-earth creationists out there, Ken Ham’s Answers In Genesis has maintained a handy guide to schools that will not challenge creationist faith.

creation colleges screenshot

Can college make a difference?

At Heterodox Academy, Joshua Dunn has reviewed the Intercollegiate Studies Institute’s guide to conservative colleges. As Dunn relates, ISI has been the voice of “movement” conservatism on America’s campuses for generations. For its college survey, ISI looked at 148 schools. As Dunn explains,

To measure the academic seriousness of an institution, ISI examined the faculty and course offerings in three departments, English, History, and Political Science. In English, it looked for that classes focusing on great authors in the western literary tradition but without an emphasis on trendy and politicized literary theories.  “Avoid,” ISI urges, “classes that mention ‘race,’ ‘class,’ or ‘gender.’” In short, study Chaucer and Shakespeare but leave the “fecopoetics” and deconstructionism behind. History departments should require classes that cover more than post-1965 American protest movements. And Political Science departments should require courses in classical political philosophy and the U.S. Constitution. If a department’s course offerings are skewed toward “Marxist meta-analysis of postcolonial Asia,” students should look elsewhere.

The ISI guide gives schools a “green light,” “yellow light,” or “red light” rating. Many elite schools, such as Amherst, Duke, and Oberlin, are no-gos for conservative students. The ISI system, however, produces some surprises. Schools such as Wheaton College—one of the evangelical schools I’m writing about these days—come out with only a “yellow light” ranking, in spite of the fact that their faculty all agree to an evangelical statement of faith. On the other hand, riotously pluralist schools like my own beloved Binghamton University get a green light, in spite of the fact that we welcome many avowedly leftist professors to our campus.

What is a conservative student to do? I’m torn. On the one hand, I’m deeply sympathetic to all students—even conservative students—who are made to feel out-of-place or unwelcome in their schools. On the other hand, as I’ve argued in these pages and in my recent book about conservative activism in education, much of the conservative angst about the state of higher education is woefully misleading.

It can be very difficult to look past authoritative-sounding college guidebooks. What student does not want to go to a top-ranked school? But all students, whatever their ideological or religious backgrounds, should rely on more than a book to choose a college. Talk to people you know who have gone there. Visit the campus. Ask difficult questions of admissions officers. Read the student newspapers.

In the end, relying on a college guide to choose the best school is about as useful as relying on a sandwich guide to help you choose the best lunch.

Leave a comment


  1. Conservatives can attend the same colleges as everyone else.

    The whole idea is to broaden ones perspective. If conservatives prefer to remain ignorant, then they don’t need to go to college at all.

    (Just my two cents).

    • Agellius

       /  December 28, 2015


      In that case shouldn’t liberal students go out of their way to attend Liberty U. or Thomas Aquinas College in order to broaden their perspectives?

      • I don’t know enough about Liberty U or about Thomas Aquinas C, though I do have doubts about Liberty U. As far as I know, you can get a pretty good (and broad) education at Wheaton. Or at least you could until the recent crackdown — I’m not sure if that is true any more.

      • Good news! ILYBYGTH will soon be publishing an intellectual memoir of a student who attended one of America’s most staunchly conservative fundamentalist universities. I was surprised to hear his descriptions of readings and academic influences. I was enlightened to learn what actually happened intellectually at a school committed to fundamentalism. It was not as monolithic/stultifying as I had assumed. Maybe other people will be, like me, surprised by the intellectual goings-on at fundamentalist schools.

      • Depends what you mean by education. Would you want to be roped into dorm meetings where an administrator (future president) tells the guys they have a shower/plumbing/idle hand problem and that sort of thing is off limits for Christian males — and then when campus women catch wind of the event they graffiti said dorm with messages to the effect of “any men who do that sort of thing are not dating/marriage material.” You couldn’t pay me enough to put up with that or to subsidize any of my young adult children going there.

  2. @Adam St. Johns is at once famous and also a relatively unknown gem beloved of segments of the old movement cons and others who love that approach to liberal arts education. The ISI guide section you quoted sounds pretty sane to me — but the same should apply in reverse. Conservative schools that have zero (or only polemical) engagement of certain topics and fields are just as defective for the same reasons.

  1. How Not to Woo Conservative Students | I Love You but You're Going to Hell
  2. What Vouchers Can Do: Florida Tax-Funded Fundamentalism | I Love You but You're Going to Hell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: