Are colleges addicted to the internet? Are charter schools “public?” Do Satanists pick up litter? We read with interest the answers to all these questions and more, in our weekly round-up of news ‘n’ views:
Fancy college finds out it can’t live without technology, at IHE.
Walmartification of college, at CHE.
- Why are evangelical universities over-represented in the mega-online world? Here at ILYBYGTH.
The sawdust trail moves online…
NJ passes mandatory LGBTQ curriculum, at WNYC.
Why white evangelical women still love Trump, at TC.
White evangelical women . . . rally behind Melania Trump and Ivanka Trump and equate their conservative version of traditional femininity with grace and elegance. . . . The seeming paradox of white evangelical women backing Trump really isn’t a paradox at all. In fact, their support says more about the state of white evangelical Christianity in the US than it does about anything else.
Not just polarized, but…Emma Green on “the bubble:”
a significant minority of Americans seldom or never meet people of another race. They dislike interacting with people who don’t share their political beliefs. And when they imagine the life they want for their children, they prize sameness, not difference. . . . When asked how they would feel about their child marrying someone from the opposite political party, 45 percent of Democrats said they would be unhappy, compared with 35 percent of Republicans.
More strikes and rumors of strikes: Oakland ‘n’ West Virginia, at NPR.
Fundamentalist U leading from behind: More universities assert in loco parentis authority, at CHE.
- I’m starting to think that the real “trend” is that evangelical colleges are leaders, not followers, in higher-ed administration. Other schools keep returning to the moral traditions that evangelical colleges never left. At ILYBYGTH.
Are charter schools “public?” Peter Greene says no, at Curmudgucation.
More evidence: 1970s’ hijinx have become 2019 felonies.
On the highway to hell: Satanists adopt a mile in Arkansas, at FA.

…wow.