School Wellness Programs: The Latest Frontier in the Culture Wars?

By Natalia Mehlman Petrzela

It was “showdown day” last Tuesday at a packed-to-capacity meeting of the Encinitas, California school board, during which the board faced angry threats of litigation in a heated dispute far afield of those predictable curricular lightning rods, sex education or science instruction. The embattled program is yoga.

Yoga?

In late October, about 60 Encinitas parents approached the board to strenuously oppose an Ashtanga yoga curriculum offered 30 minutes twice weekly to students district-wide. “I will not allow my children to be indoctrinated,” one parent insisted. Another expressed “a deep concern [the District] is using taxpayer resources to promote… religious beliefs and practices” on children “being used as guinea pigs.” Anxieties that opposing parents were forced to “segregate their children” reached fever pitch – one said kids opting out faced ostracism, comparing the situation to Nazi Germany.

As the local and national press has been quick to report, this vocal minority of parents “bent out of shape” or “in a twist” about savasana at school want the program terminated immediately. Their attorney, Dean Broyles, whose firm National Center for Law and Policy, is devoted to defending “faith, family, and freedom,” as well as “traditional marriage” and “parental rights” articulates the core issue as “the EUSD using taxpayer resources to promote Ashtanga yoga and Hinduism, a religious system of beliefs and practices.” The yoga community in Encinitas and beyond has responded fast and furiously, gathering over 2,500 signatures on a petition to preserve the program.

California is no stranger to heated educational controversy – beginning in the 1960s when the state was known (renowned by some, reviled by others) for its breakneck pedagogical innovation, the region became ground zero in some of the nation’s fieriest debates over sex education, character education, ethnic studies and bilingual education.  Such progressivism, conservatives charged, was expensive, immoral, academically unserious, and even un-American. Perhaps worst of all to grass-roots groups like POSSE (Parents Organized to Stop Sex Education) and CPR (Citizens for Parental Responsibility), the emphasis on critical reflection shared by these diverse initiatives undermined parental prerogative to determine their children’s worldview.

Encinitas might just be the perfect theater for a contemporary battle in these culture wars pitting traditionalist parents advocating for “the 3 Rs” against “hippie” pedagogies. The beachfront community embodies the cultural extremes defining California: Encinitas is known as a mecca for kale-eating freethinkers who seek out the diverse yoga practices with local strongholds and the open-minded environment, while surrounding San Diego County remains one of the country’s most politically conservative regions.

But the Encinitas yoga battle is more than just a new skirmish in an old fight waged by familiar combatants; it represents what will likely be a new theater of war in the educational culture wars in the 21st century.

The complaints among conservatives about yoga promoting Hinduism and mysticism are hardly of a piece with recent resistance to Christian Texas cheerleaders reading scripture at football games, as some press accounts have assumed. The rhetoric of the Encinitas parents’ protests may nominally be to free schools of religious influence, but the mission of Broyles’ firm is actually to defend the very principles the Christian cheerleaders espouse. A linchpin of the traditionalist perspective since the 1960s has been that liberals “took God out of schools and put sex [or Chicano studies or black children or the New Math] in,” as said one disgruntled father in the late 1960s. In the Encinitas case, however, the complaint is that there is too much God in the schools, just the wrong deity. This shift speaks to a transformation in how conservatives and liberals envision the appropriate role of spirituality at school… here conservatives position themselves as the defenders of civic secularism, in stark contrast to the stance which first galvanized their movement.

1960s culture warriors of any stripe couldn’t have fathomed the popularity “school wellness” would attain in the last two decades — enfolding not only yoga but also gardening, cooking, exercise, and meditation– and contemporary advocates of such curricula have difficulty understanding how these innocuous initiatives can inspire controversy. The press, the EUSD, and scores of online commenters expressed shock that anyone would suggest, “a little stress-reducing exercise ever hurt anyone,” especially in the context of a much-discussed “obesity crisis.” The Los Angeles Times couldn’t believe the degree of the plaintive parents’ worries, as yoga is regularly practiced in San Diego spots as disparate as the Camp Pendleton naval base and the Jois yoga enclave, which funds the school program. Glamour commented, “most people associated with the controversy are scratching their heads,” quoting similarly incredulous Jois chief executive: “It’s hard to know how to respond to someone who says if you touch your toes, you’re inviting the devil into your soul.”

Onlookers should not be so surprised at the perspectives Broyles raises, and should expect expanding wellness programs to generate more concerns, on the right and left. Encinitas parents are not the first social conservatives to oppose yoga; there’s even a cottage industry of Christian alternatives to the practice. Moreover, historians remind us that yoga’s well-scrubbed image today – think wholesome spectacles such as children doing yoga on the White House Lawn to celebrate Easter – elides the practice’s overtly spiritual and erotic origins. On the other end of the political spectrum, the field of Fat Studies argues the whole “obesity crisis” that provides the rationale for many wellness programs – including that in Encinitas – is fundamentally flawed, based more on our cultural aversion to fat bodies than on any objective health criteria. Michael Pollan, patron saint of the “real food” approach core to so many wellness programs, acknowledges that this new cultural terrain “mixes up the usual categories” even as the origins of the food and wellness movement are the same 1960s impulses that fueled the first round of the polarizing culture wars.

A familiar indignation over squandered tax dollars fuels the frustration of the Encinitas parents, though here it is largely misplaced, as the program is financed by a $533,000 grant from the private non-profit Jois Foundation. If the wellness movement suggests a newly fraught educational politics, so too does this funding situation. Nationwide, budget constraints are making public districts increasingly dependent on private initiative, especially for offerings such as wellness, which despite their popularity are usually deemed as “enrichment” rather than as a core academic need. As outside groups step in to fill curricular gaps and districts have fewer resources to shape these interventions, wellness programs are likely the next theater of battle in our ongoing but evolving educational culture wars… in which the earnest claim of the Encinitas superintendent that “it is just physical activity” sounds ever more naïve.

Natalia Mehlman Petrzela is Assistant Professor of Education Studies and History at Eugene Lang College The New School for Liberal Arts and is also co-founder of HealthClass2.0, a school-based wellness
program (www.healthclass.org). Her forthcoming book on culture wars in education is tentatively entitled SCHOOLED RIGHT: THE EDUCATIONAL ORIGINS OF CONTEMPORARY CONSERVATISM.

 

 

 

About these ads
Leave a comment

11 Comments

  1. My wife is on the mailing list for the Kripalu yoga school in western Mass., and today we received a snappy brochure advertising a course in “bring[ing] yoga to high school students and develop[ing] tools to partner with nonprofits and after-school programs serving teens in your community. . . . You learn solid class outlines and effective languaging geared toward teens, as well as engage in insightful lectures on adolescent development, role playing, and discussions that delve into and examine the teen experience.”
    Maybe the Kripalu folks should include a seminar in deflecting culture-war antagonists(?)

    Reply
  2. Larry

     /  December 14, 2012

    My wife, your mother-in-law, will go a bit crazy when I share the Encinitas conflict with her. She will recognize as a life-long teacher and practitioner of yoga the unfounded sterotypes about what yoga really is. I must say that in living with her for almost 48 years, that she is more balanced, normal, and sound than most folks I know, and certainly more so that I.

    Reply
    • But to play devil’s advocate a minute, didn’t she also teach a yoga class in a Catholic high school as part of a class in “Prayer and Spiritual Journeys?” And, if that class was worthwhile–which I think it was–then aren’t the Encinitas protesters right in assuming a religious message to be part of yoga? That is, if yoga teaches spiritual and religious practices, then isn’t it a devotional practice? And, as such, shouldn’t it be verboten at public schools?
      To stay off the poop-list of my balanced, normal, and sound mother-in-law, let me answer this objection myself: Just because yoga CAN be used to deepen or broaden prayerful practice does not mean that it MUST. For instance, public school students can study the Bible in public school classes, but if they do it as literature and culture, then the practice is acceptable. Just because people CAN use the Bible to pray doesn’t mean that every reader of the Bible is praying with it.
      Fair? Will I still be welcome at family dinners?

      Reply
  3. Larry

     /  December 17, 2012

    Nice advocacy objection, and even better answer to it. There are many kinds of yoga, and I’m guessing the type being proposed in Encinitas is Hatha Yoga which probably fits into a school curriculum as a type of phy ed or health class. I believe the negative sterotype occurs with some folks confusing the term energy with the term spirituality. However, I do think that some who begin taking Hatha Yoga seriously for health/physical reasons find themselves being drawn toward an eagerness to a deeper spirituality for the same reasons that some runners, weight trainers, or the like do because they sense their bodies are part of their entire being–physical, mental, social, emotional, spiritual.

    Reply
  1. Scooping the New York Times « I Love You but You're Going to Hell
  2. From the Archives: Yoga, Schools, and “Those Dirty Books” « I Love You but You're Going to Hell
  3. How the Encinitas yoga controversy is on the cultural war’s cutting edge « The Confluence Countdown
  4. UPDATE: Yoga Okay for Public Schools | I Love You but You're Going to Hell
  5. 22 awesome things I used to believe were sinful | Leaving Fundamentalism
  6. Yoga—Not for Public Schools | I Love You but You're Going to Hell
  7. Yoga in School? Yes, No, Maybe So | I Love You but You're Going to Hell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 309 other followers